The Royal Institution joins 45 leading science organisations in a letter to European policy makers to highlight that an open exchange of people and ideas is crucial for science.
For over 200 years the Royal Institution’s core purpose has been to promote and uphold a healthy and dynamic interaction between science and the public. Our founding documents talk about the importance of both the ‘diffusion of knowledge’ and the ‘introduction of useful mechanical inventions and improvements’ to the public. And on the topic of engaging the public in scientific discourse, Lawrence Bragg once wrote:
I believe that it is our duty, in return for the support we are given, to render an account of our stewardship which is readily understandable by our fellow men, who are intelligent and shrewd although they may not be familiar with all our technical terms
So when EuroScience sent us the open letter they had prepared to send to various European policy makers regarding recent decisions by US President Donald Trump's administration, one of their concerns particularly resonated with us:
Indications that government scientists might be affected by new administration policies limiting their communication with the press, policymakers or society at large, and that government scientists would require permission from superiors to publish
In view of the fact that our founding principles rest on the ability of scientists to have a dialogue with the public, we are proud to sign this letter to share our concerns about any policies which limit this ability of scientists to speak openly.
Here is the open letter and the list of current signatories in full.
We, as European organisations involved in science (which for us includes the social sciences and humanities), research, education and innovation, benefit from and wish to defend the open exchange of ideas and people, which constitutes the foundation of scientific endeavour.
From our multiple contacts with scientists, researchers and organisations in the USA and around the world we are aware of the anxiety among our colleagues concerning the impact of the ongoing policy reorientation under President Donald Trump and his administration. We are particularly concerned about the following developments:
All of these are at odds with the principles of transparency, open communication, and mobility of scholars and scientists, which are vital to scientific progress and to the benefit of our societies, economies and cultures derive from it. Restrictions on research, scientists and research centres in inconvenient areas have no place in science.
Our colleagues working in the US will suffer, the United States and US citizens will pay a price, as will Europe and Europeans, and countries and people all across the globe. Facing unprecedented challenges the world needs solid science and research resulting from an open scientific process in which scientists, researchers, students and innovators can freely exchange approaches and results, and can move from country to country to study and work where their contributions are most valuable.
We call upon European governments and the European Commission to uphold the principles and values that underpin scientific progress, to work with their counterparts in the US administration to maintain a global science system based on these principles and to take any measure at the national and European levels to preserve and increase the world’s scientific and research capacity. These principles and values have been and will remain vital for our societies, economies and cultures to flourish.
List of signatories
Accademia delle Scienze di Torino
ALLEA (ALL European Academies)
British Biophysical Society
Citizens of Academia, Poland
Danish National Committee for Biophysics
Young Academy of Belgium
EPSO, European Plant Science Organisation
European Association of Social Anthropologists
European Association of Social Psychology
European Biophysical Societies' Association
European Crystallographic Association
European Educational Research Association
European Mathematical Society
European Physical Society
President and Executive European Science Foundation
European Society for Gene and Cell Therapy
European Society of Endocrinology
European University Association
Executive Committee of Turkish Biophysical Society
Federation of European Neuroscience Societies
French Biophysical Society
German Biophysical Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Biophysik)
International Consortium of Research Staff Associations (ICoRSA)
Italian Society of Pure and Applied Biophysics
LERU, League of European Research Universities
Marie Curie Alumni Association
Portuguese Biophysical Society
Pan European Region of the International Association for Dental Research
Polish Women Scientists Network - Fundacji Kobiety Nauki
Real Sociedad Matemática Española
ROARS (Return On Academic ReSearch, Italy)
Science Europe (Association of European Research Funding Agencies and Research Performing Organisations)
Scientists for EU
Sense about Science EU
Societas biochemica, biophysica et microbiologica Fenniae
Spanish Biophysical Society
Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences
The Royal Society
The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
The Royal Institution of Great Britain
The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences KNAW
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
The Ri's Gail Cardew on why the work of the Lloyds Register Foundation Institute for the Public Understanding of Risk links with the Ri’s objective to encourage people to think more deeply about the place of science in their lives.
Posted to Talking science on27th July 2017
The Ri's Gail Cardew proposes that there are more similarities than there are differences, between science and art.
Posted on18th July 2017